| |
Research > Kids Are People Electronic Monitoring
Program
 |
| |
Evaluation
of Kids Are People Electronic Monitoring Program
(A JAIBG Project)
|
Principal investigator: |
N.E. Schafer |
|
Other project personnel: |
Pamela Martin |
|
Project dates: |
Oct 1, 1999 - Sep 30, 2000 |
|
JC#: |
0010 |
|
Agency: |
Bureau of Justice Statistics |
|
Project amount: |
$9,546 |
|
Project status: |
Completed |
The area to be served by the Kids
Are People (KAP) electronic monitoring program reaches from
Palmer to Cantwell in the north, to Glennallen in the east, and
to Cordova in the south -- an area of nearly 19,000 square miles.
Glennallen, Valdez, and Cordova are served by one probation officer.
(The remainder of the region has five probation officers. Supervising
youth in so large an area becomes both problematic and expensive.
Electronic monitoring can provide an amount of control which
is not possible with traditional probation supervision.
Juvenile Accountability Incentive
Block Grant (JAIBG) funds will be used to add Voice and Location
Update Evaluation (VALUE) monitoring to the more restrictive
form of electronic monitoring already in use in this region.
Traditional EM requires a base
unit in the offender's home. The device is connected to a telephone
line on household power. The offender is then fitted with an
ankle bracelet which serves as a transmitter to a receiving computer.
At pre-programmed stages throughout the day, indicator lights
trigger offender reporting/response actions in order to provide
information on the offender's location. Allowances for offender
activities such as school and work can be programmed into the
receiving computer. Assuming all schedules and communications
are filed in a timely manner and are received on time by monitoring
personnel, electronic monitoring offers reliable supervision
that is preferable to detention for at-risk youth deemed acceptable
for such a program.
VALUE seeks to eliminate both the
telephone unit and the ankle bracelet, relying instead on voice
communication to receiving equipment in a designated monitoring
office. The receiving equipment then pinpoints offender location,
affording monitoring personnel immediate information on any deviation
from probation conditions. At the same time, the offender is
not tied to bulky equipment and is able to move about with minimal
intrusion other than directed telephone contact.
KAP also plans to provide aftercare
to both VALUE and EM clients. These services, in the form of
mentoring and mediating/counselor relationships with affected
youth and their families, will be made available for 60 days
after completion of the program with a goal of fostering new
behaviors learned during monitoring.
To evaluate the program, the Justice
Center will compare behavioral outcomes for three specific groups:
those on VALUE, those on traditional EM, and youth on informal
or formal probation. Evaluation will involve examination of probationer
files, interviews with VALUE and traditional EM clients and their
families, and interviews with field probation officers in the
region. The utility of this program for supervising probationers
in large areas with few probation officers is of particular interest
in the state of Alaska, and the evaluation will address this
interest.
Products
|
Return to Research
index | Justice Center Home Page
| Camai (UAA Home Page)
© Copyright 2002,
University of Alaska Anchorage
Last updated 4 Sep
2002 by ayjust@uaa.alaska.edu
|