Under contract with the Alaska Judicial Council, the Justice Center from
1992 to 2000 (election years only) conducted surveys of Alaska Bar Association
members and Alaska police and probation officers to obtain quantitative
data as part of the Judicial Council's evaluation of Alaska judges standing
for retention in election years. The Judicial
Council is directed by law to evaluate the performance of judges due to
appear on the ballot. The Council collects evaluations from attorneys, peace
and probation officers, jurors, social workers, public hearings, and information
from many other sources. The Council then recommends to the public whether
each judge should be retained. The recommendations, as well as information
about the evaluation of each judge, are sent to each voter in the Official
Election Pamphlet.
|
Products
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention in 1992.
By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial Council.
Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, May 1992.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention in 1994.
By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial Council.
Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, May 1992.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Pro Tem Judges. By Richard W. Curtis.
Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial Council. Anchorage: Justice
Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, May 1992.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: U.S. Federal District Court Judges.
By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial Council.
Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, May 1992.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention in 1994.
By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial Council.
Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, May 1994.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention in 1996.
By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial Council.
Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, May 1994.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Pro Tem Judges. By Richard W. Curtis.
Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial Council. Anchorage: Justice
Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, May 1994.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: U.S. Federal District Court Judges.
By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial Council.
Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, May 1994.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention Election
in 1996. By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial
Council. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage,
May 1996.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention Election
in 1998. By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial
Council. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage,
May 1996.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention Election
in 1998. By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial
Council. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage,
May 1998.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention Election
in 2000. By Richard W. Curtis. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial
Council. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage,
May 1998.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention Election
in 2000. By Matthew Giblin. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial
Council. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage,
May 2000.
- Judicial Evaluation Survey: Judges Standing for Retention Election
in 2002. By Matthew Giblin. Report prepared for the Alaska Judicial
Council. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage,
May 2000.
|