An Alaska Judicial Council evaluation of the three felony-level therapeutic
courts has revealed that graduates of the programs have been rearrested
and re-convicted far less frequently than comparison offenders who did
not participate in the programs. Moreover, the longer the participants
remained in the programs, the less likely they were to recidivate, even
if they did not graduate.
The evaluation followed 117 offenders who
participated in one of the three programs—the felony alcohol problem
courts in Anchorage and Bethel or the felony drug court in Anchorage—and
compared results with those for 97 offenders who did not participate.
The evaluation tracked offenders for one year after they completed or
left their programs and followed offenders in the comparison group for
one year after they had completed their sentences. Most of the offenders
had originally been convicted of a Class C felony at the time of their
admission to the therapeutic court programs; a few had been convicted
of a Class B felony, and a few in the Bethel program had only a serious
misdemeanor conviction. All program participants showed evidence of serious
drug or alcohol problems.
The findings of the study included the following:
- The longer the participants stayed in the program, the less likely
they were to recidivate even if they did not graduate.
- Fifty-four percent of the participants in these projects graduated.
- Thirteen percent of graduates were re-arrested within one year after
completing a therapeutic court program compared to a 32 percent re-arrest
rate for matched comparison offenders.
- Participants who were discharged from the programs or who left voluntarily
had about the same rate of re-arrests as offenders charged with felonies
in 1999.
- Older participants were less likely to be re-arrested than younger
participants.
- Participants in the Anchorage Felony DUI Court were less likely to
be re-arrested than those in the Anchorage Felony Drug Court and the
Bethel Therapeutic Court.
- No participants in the programs who were re-convicted within the
first year were convicted of an offense at a more serious level than
the one on which they entered the therapeutic courts. None were convicted
of a drug or sexual offense. In contrast, 3 percent of the comparison
offenders were convicted of offenses at a more serious level. In the
Council’s companion report on recidivism among 1999 offenders,
about 15 percent of most types of offenders were convicted of offenses
at a more serious level.
- Native participants responded as well to the therapeutic court programs
as did Caucasian participants. Blacks and other ethnicities did not
do as well as Caucasian participants.
The Council recommended that the state
should develop further information about the costs and benefits of therapeutic
court programs; should explore the reasons for the relative success of
Native participants in the programs; and should determine why ethnic groups
other than Natives and Caucasians did not do as well in the programs.
The information presented in the previous
article is taken from Recidivism
in Alaska’s Felony Therapeutic Courts, Alaska Judicial
Council, February 2007, http://www.ajc.state.ak.us/.
Further
Reading on Recidivism in Alaska
Note on web version: Some URLs have been updated from
the hardcopy version of this bibliography.
Alaska Division of Legislative
Audit. (23 Feb 2007). Use of Recidivism Rates by State Agencies: Overview
of Current Practices. Juneau, AK: Alaska Division of Legislative
Audit. (http://www.legaudit.state.ak.us/pages/digests/2007/30035adig.htm).
———.
(9 Mar 2007). Use of Recidivism Rates by State Agencies: Recidivism
Rates for Alaska Sex Offenders. Juneau, AK: Alaska Division of Legislative
Audit. (http://www.legaudit.state.ak.us/pages/digests/2007/30035cdig.htm).
———. (13
Mar 2007). Use of Recidivism Rates by State Agencies: Recidivism Rates
for the Alcohol Safety Action Program. Juneau, AK: Alaska Division
of Legislative Audit. (http://www.legaudit.state.ak.us/pages/digests/2007/30035bdig.htm).
Alaska Judicial Council.
(Apr 2005). Evaluation of the Outcomes in Three Therapeutic Courts:
Anchorage Felony Drug Court, Anchorage Felony DUI Court, Bethel Therapeutic
Court. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Judicial Council. (http://www.ajc.state.ak.us/reports/TherCt2004.pdf).
———. (Jan
2007). Criminal Recidivism in Alaska. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Judicial
Council. (http://www.ajc.state.ak.us/reports/1-07CriminalRecidivism.pdf).
———. (Feb
2007). Recidivism in Alaska’s Felony Therapeutic Courts.
Anchorage, AK: Alaska Judicial Council. (http://www.ajc.state.ak.us/reports/RecidivismTherCt2-13-07.pdf).
Carns, Teresa W.; Cohn,
Larry; and Dosik, Susie Mason. (Feb 2004). Alaska Felony Process:
1999. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Judicial Council. (http://www.ajc.state.ak.us/reports/Fel99FullReport.pdf).
Justice Center, University
of Alaska Anchorage. (Winter 2007). “Offender Recidivism Figures.”
Alaska Justice Forum 23(4): 5-6. (http://justice.uaa.alaska.edu/forum/23/4winter2007/c_recidivism.html).
|