A study of homelessness among youths in Homer, Alaska conducted by the
Justice Center at University of Alaska Anchorage in 2004 has revealed
that family trouble in one form or another is the usual cause behind youths
first becoming homeless. While most of those who participated in the study
did not remain chronically homeless, some did progress into more a severe
type of homelessness, in which the prospect of returning to a family became
more remote. The study identified that the needs of those who had been
homeless for longer periods differed from those for whom it was a new
or short-term event. The study, which the Justice Center undertook at
the request of the Child Advocacy Coalition of Homer (CACH), seems to
be the most extensive structured look at homelessness in Alaska yet undertaken.
The Center developed and administered a lengthy
interview to eighteen Homer youths who were either currently homeless or
had been homeless in the past. The interview sought information on demographic
characteristics, residential history, alcohol and drug use, income, daily
activities, health, legal and safety issues, other youths in Homer, and
opinions regarding services. The goals of the project were to document the
needs of homeless youths in Homer and to assess the extent to which these
needs were being addressed.
How
Youths First became Homeless
Certain factors stood out clearly as important
causes behind youths initially becoming homeless. When youths were asked
what caused their homelessness, eight (47.1%) indicated family problems,
six (35.3%) indicated it was their personal choice to become homeless
(although these personal choices were often caused by family problems),
and three (17.6%) indicated other reasons.
Detailed results are shown in Table 1. In
terms of family problems, over half (58.8%) of the youths indicated that
they became homeless because they could not get along with their parents.
Parental problems included parental divorce, parental absence, parental
use of drugs and alcohol, and parental discord. Youths also became homeless
because they did not follow parental rules and/or were kicked out by parents.
Six youths (35.3%) simply ran away. Verbal abuse was mentioned as a contributor
to the youths’ homelessness by seven (41.2%) of the youths. Few
youths (11.8%) mentioned physical abuse and none (0%) mentioned sexual
abuse as causes of homelessness. Sexual abuse, however, is the least likely
victimization to be reported to police, and youths might not have been
willing to report it to us. Six youths (35.3%) mentioned the high cost
of housing and rent and five youths (29.4%), the lack of employment opportunities.
Causes mentioned less frequently included housing eviction, mental health
issues, problems with the law, and problems with siblings.
Overall, it was clear that many youths had
become homeless in the first place because of problems at home, mostly
caused by verbal abuse and an inability or unwillingness to follow parental
rules. Although some youths indicated that they became homeless by choice,
these choices clearly resulted from problems at home. For these, family
counseling was therefore the most important service in avoiding homelessness.

How Some
Youths Remained Homeless
Perhaps not surprisingly, the need for
family counseling became less noted as homelessness became more severe.
Certain youths had progressively distanced themselves from their families
to the point where returning home was no longer a reasonable possibility.
At that point, family counseling was needed less than employment assistance.
Among the youths that we surveyed, lack of employment was the most significant
barrier to acquiring permanent housing once returning home was no longer
an option. Detailed results are shown in Table 2.
When it was no longer possible to return
home, many youths remained homeless because they could not obtain their
own housing. As reasons for remaining homeless, six youths (37.5%) identified
housing affordability, four youths (25.0%) identified housing availability,
two youths (12.5%) identified moving costs, three youths (18.8%) identified
transportation costs, five youths (31.3%) indicated they were too young
to sign a lease, and four youths (25.0%) indicated they had no rental
references.
The problem of housing in Homer may be less
one of availability than one of affordability. In general, the housing
picture in Homer differs from that of the state as a whole: residents
seem to spend a much higher portion of their income on housing. There
were 92.5 percent more renter-occupied units costing less than $300 per
month in Homer than in Alaska as a whole, but the median household income
in Homer was 20.4 percent lower than in the state as a whole, and the
percentage of households spending 35 percent or more of their income on
housing was much higher in Homer than elsewhere in the state—that
is, in Homer there are more people with low incomes who must spend a larger
portion of their incomes on housing. While Homer appears to have a number
of low-cost housing options when viewed from the perspective of the state
as a whole, these may still be too costly for Homer families with low
incomes—and for homeless youth.
An adequate income is necessary to gain
access to housing, for homeless youths as well as everyone else. Five
youths (31.3%) indicated that they remained homeless because they lacked
employment.
The inaccessibility of housing, therefore,
was not caused by housing availability but by affordability. Youths lacked
the employment that was necessary to pay for housing. We can conclude
that employment assistance was the most important service needed to avoid
remaining chronically homeless.
Needs
In addition to the need for family counseling
and employment assistance discussed above, homeless youths also expressed
a need for drug and alcohol programming and recreational opportunities.
All but two youths (88.2%) had used alcohol
in the past, all but three youths (83.3%) had used cigarettes, and all
but two youths (88.2%) had used marijuana. The majority of youths (85.7%
and 86.7% respectively) started using alcohol and marijuana before becoming
homeless. Although a majority reported using alcohol both within the last
year and within the last month, none reported daily use. Most (80.0%),
however, reported daily use of cigarettes and 38.9 percent reported daily
use of marijuana. Of the 18 youths, 11 (61.1%) also reported using other
drugs. Although other drug use was common, it was clearly more experimental
than the use of alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana. Overall, 7 (38.9%)
of the 18 homeless youths felt that they had used alcohol or drugs in
ways that had negatively affected their functioning at home or school.
Most youths expressed that alcohol and drugs had had a negative psychological
impact (e.g., mood changes, depression). Given the prevalence of alcohol
and drug use and given that youths recognized the negative impacts that
alcohol and drug use have on their lives, homeless youths in Homer might
benefit from better prevention and intervention efforts.
When asked what types of services were most
needed in Homer, the vast majority (77.8%) expressed a need for places
or outdoor locations where youths were welcome. In fact, 50.5 percent
of the youths identified this as the most important needed service. No
other result from our survey of homeless youths showed as much consistency
as the expressed need for additional recreational opportunities.
It is important to note that this survey
relies on the youths’ answers and therefore may not match the perceptions
of others. From the youths’ point of view, however, recreation was
the most important need. Although it may be doubtful that recreational
opportunities would prevent homelessness, there is no doubt that youths
in Homer lack adequate prosocial recreational opportunities and, as a
result, spend much of their time bored or engaged in self-destructive
behaviors. This conclusion is corroborated by our survey of available
services. Few agencies in Homer provide recreational opportunities for
adolescents. Most that do so are schools. This is problematic because
(1) these services are available during the school year only and (2) these
services are not available for youths not in school. Homeless youths are
less likely to be in school and typically experience more problems during
the summer, when school programs are not available. Although schools should
continue their efforts to provide youth services, other agencies must
step in when schools are closed and must provide services to youths that
are not in school.
To summarize, the recommendations that emerged
from this study were to enhance employment assistance, drug and alcohol
programming, family counseling, and recreational opportunities. Employment
assistance should be designed to lead youths into productive work that
pays enough to afford housing. All services should be developed so that
they are also available during the summer, when youths are out of school,
and available to all youths, including those who have stopped going to
school. We also emphasized the need to keep the cost of these services
as low as possible, as most of these youths (and their families) had few
financial resources. Finally, we suggested that existing services be better
publicized, since few youths were aware of the resources already available.
Results from our survey clearly indicated
that the causes of becoming homeless were different than the causes for
remaining homeless. As youths slide into more severe forms of homelessness,
the focus of assistance efforts must change from prevention to intervention.
Successful prevention services would address the causes of becoming homeless
while successful intervention services would address those for remaining
homeless. Results from our survey indicate that the primary cause for
becoming homeless was family problems while the primary cause for remaining
homeless was lack of employment at an adequate wage.
Overall, the results from this survey were
quite encouraging. There is much that can be done to address youth homelessness.
Drug and alcohol counseling, family counseling, and employment assistance
are already offered in many Alaskan communities. Unfortunately, youths
were not always aware that these services were available, and some youths
were disappointed with the quality of the services that were offered.
We should strive to enhance these available social services as well as
expand recreational opportunities.
André Rosay is an assistant
professor at the Justice Center. The report 2004 Census and Survey of
Homeless Youths in Homer, Alaska is available on the Justice Center website
at http://justice.uaa.alaska.edu. |