| |
Alaska
Justice Forum
11(4), Winter 1995
Issue
contents | Complete
issue in Adobe Acrobat PDF format
| Abstract: A report from the Anchorage SAFE City
Program examining police response to domestic violence calls
reveals that Anchorage Police Department (APD) has successfully
implemented a domestic violence policy which treats such cases
as criminal offenses and reflects consistent concern for victim
safety. This article examines the implementation of APD's domestic
violence policy in three areas: (1) arrest action; (2) evidence
collection through the use of report forms; and (3) officer action
in ensuring victim safety and distribution of victim resource
information. |
Implementation
of Police Domestic Violence Policy
Carrie D. Longoria
A report released by the SAFE
City Program in the Anchorage Department of Health and Human
Services examining police response to domestic violence calls
reveals that the Anchorage Police Department (APD) has successfully
implemented policy which treats such cases as criminal offenses
and reflects consistent concern for victim safety. APD policy
for domestic violence cases requires that arrests be made in
all incidents where there is probable cause to assume that a
violation of Alaska's domestic violence laws has occurred. Since
the late 1980s Alaska state laws have permitted arrest on probable
cause in domestic violence incidents, and a related state law
enacted during the same period requires law enforcement officers
to distribute information on community services and legal options
to victims of domestic violence.
Research conducted in other locations
has claimed that arrests are rarely made in domestic violence
cases and that police generally exhibit a lack of responsiveness
to domestic incidents.
The study summarized in this article
examined the implementation of Anchorage Police Department policy
on domestic violence in three areas: 1) arrest action; 2) evidence
collection through the use of report forms; and 3) officer action
in ensuring victim safety and distribution of victim resource
information. The department worked with the municipal SAFE City
Program to make the data available for this analysis. Of the
8084 reported cases of domestic violence between 1989 and 1992,
a random sample of twenty per cent -- 1609 reports -- were analyzed.
The assumption of the researcher was that police reports detailing
specific actions will reveal the extent of policy implementation.
Arrest Action Policy
Of the 1609 reports, only cases
(n=897) where an officer was dispatched and a subject identified
were evaluated on arrest action. Arrest action was defined as
making an arrest, forwarding the case for investigation, issuing
a summons, or taking other legal action to detain the suspect.
As shown in Table 1, an arrest or arrest-like action occurred
in 79 per cent of all domestic violence incidents where the suspect
was identified and present at the site. Such a high percentage
offers strong indication that Anchorage police officers are following
departmental policy on domestic violence calls.
For a subset of these cases
-- those which involved a male suspect, a female victim and a
spousal-like relationship -- five independent variables were
analyzed in conjunction with arrest action: injury, intoxication,
ethnicity, relationship of couple, and victim cooperation.
Injury. This study shows
a strong relationship between victim injury and police arrest
action. Over the four-year study period, not only was injury
increasingly noted by the police officer, but an arrest became
more likely when injury was noted. Even when injury was claimed
by the victim but not noted by the police officer, arrests increased
over the four-year period.
Intoxication. This study
indicates that an arrest was more likely to occur if the victim
was not intoxicated, while the intoxication of the suspect had
no effect on the likelihood of arrest. (Table 2). When a victim
is intoxicated, an inability to communicate may inhibit the collection
of critical information in making a probable cause arrest.
Ethnicity of Suspect.
No statistically significant differences in arrest action were
found for the three principle ethnic groups -- white, black and
Alaska Native.
Victim Cooperation. The
data reveal that in Anchorage arrest action in domestic violence
incidents seems to be influenced by the presence or absence of
victim cooperation. If the victim was cooperative, an arrest
action was more likely to occur. Police took such action in 80
per cent of the cases where the victim was cooperative but in
only 50 per cent of those cases where a victim did not want an
arrest. Again, as with intoxication victims, an uncooperative
victim may inhibit the collection of evidence for a probable
cause arrest.
Type of Incident. Table
3 reveals that over the four-year study period the type of classification
reported for an incident has changed significantly. The number
of cases described as assault cases increased 39 per cent from
1989 to 1992, and those described as disturbances decreased by
53 per cent.
Police Report Information Policy
APD procedures require officers
to complete full police reports on domestic violence calls. These
reports include such information as incident area; date and time
of incident; description of injuries; interview information from
victim, suspect and all witnesses; collection of evidence; photographs
of injuries; and a description of the sequence of events. Table
4 illustrates the results of an analysis of 1335 reports -- only
those in which an officer was dispatched. These results demonstrate
very high compliance with departmental policy on report completion.
In only one area was information missing in a large percentage
of reports -- that documenting employment of the parties involved
in the incident.
Victim Safety Policy
APD policy requires officers
to make every possible effort to ensure the safety of the victim
and to inform the victim of local support services. Even in cases
where there is insufficient evidence to support an arrest, the
officer must supply this information to the alleged victim.
As Table 5 illustrates, in 92 per
cent of the cases studied the officer took action or provided
transportation or information to insure the safety of the victim.
In 6 per cent the victim was uncooperative and in another 2 per
cent of the cases the officer did not report on the action taken.
(Tables 5 and 6 present information on only those cases in which
an officer was dispatched: 1335.) Table 6 describes officer action
in providing information on community resources. In 70 per cent
of the cases the victim received information on these resources
or transportation to insure safety. In 30 per cent, the officer
failed to note what information, if any, was provided to the
victim. The information presented by the data in these two tables
together shows a pattern of officers facilitating the continued
safety of victims.
This study finds that Anchorage
police officers are closely following department policy and procedure.
Carrie D. Longoria is program
manager of the Anchorage SAFE City Program. Copies of the entire
report may be obtained from the SAFE City Program.
Return to Justice
Center Home Page | Camai
(UAA Home Page)
© Copyright 1995,
University of Alaska Anchorage
Last updated Nov
13, 2001 by ayjust@uaa.alaska.edu
|